W3C standards.

Six months ago, Marko Karppinen tested sites belonging to W3C members with the W3C's own validator.

3.7% used valid HTML.

The other day, he ran the test again.

4.6% used valid HTML.

It's sad, really.

Posted by Ripley on August 28, 2002

And then you said

Ewww had a go at running their validator. Yikes! I am in big trouble. Not just the html but the CCS too. Can I pretend I never noticed?

Posted by af42 on October 19, 2002 2:17 PM

Sure. I won't tell. ;)

Speaking of which, I suppose I should do some validating myself. I know parts of AF are fine. Other parts are... umm... not so fine.

Posted by Ripley on October 19, 2002 3:50 PM

Are you talkin' to her?

Posted by datawarrior on October 21, 2002 11:19 AM

Comments are closed for this entry.