W3C standards.
Six months ago, Marko Karppinen tested sites belonging to W3C members with the W3C's own validator.
3.7% used valid HTML.
The other day, he ran the test again.
4.6% used valid HTML.
It's sad, really.
Posted by Ripley on August 28, 2002
Sure. I won't tell. ;)
Speaking of which, I suppose I should do some validating myself. I know parts of AF are fine. Other parts are... umm... not so fine.
Posted by Ripley on October 19, 2002 3:50 PMAre you talkin' to her?
Posted by datawarrior on October 21, 2002 11:19 AMComments are closed for this entry.
Ewww had a go at running their validator. Yikes! I am in big trouble. Not just the html but the CCS too. Can I pretend I never noticed?
Posted by af42 on October 19, 2002 2:17 PM